Eli Reshef, MD

The Website of Eli Reshef, MD

  • Home
  • About
    • Dr. Reshef’s Bio
    • Why Choose Reshef?
  • FAQ
  • Educate Me!
    • Ectopic Pregnancy
    • Endometriosis
    • Egg Donation
    • Fibroids
    • Infertility
    • Insemination (Artificial)
    • In Vitro Fertilization
      • The IVF Journey
    • Male Factor Infertility
    • Menopause
    • Menstrual Disorders
    • Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (POCS)
    • Recurrent Pregnancy Losses
    • Unexplained Infertility
  • Contact
    • Directions
  • Links
You are here: Home / Science and Research / With Routine Mammograms, Some Breast Cancers May Be Overtreated

With Routine Mammograms, Some Breast Cancers May Be Overtreated

November 22, 2012 By Eli Reshef

by Richard Knox (NPR) November 21, 2012

The endless debate over routine mammograms is getting another kick from an analysis that sharply questions whether the test really does what it’s supposed to.

Dr. H. Gilbert Welch, coauthor of the analysis of mammography’s impact, which was just published in The New England Journal of Medicine, tell Shots that the aim was to “get down to a very basic question.”

That is, do annual mammograms among women over 40 discover early-stage breast cancers that can be treated so that they never become deadlier late-stage tumors?

Over the last three decades, diagnoses of early-stage breast cancers soared, largely due to routine mammogram screening. But the incidence of late-stage cancers declined only slightly. That leads some to question whether mammograms are really doing what they're supposed to — catching early cancers before they progress.

Over the last three decades, diagnoses of early-stage breast cancers soared, largely due to routine mammogram screening. But the incidence of late-stage cancers declined only slightly. That leads some to question whether mammograms are really doing what they’re supposed to — catching early cancers before they progress.

Alyson Hurt/NPR

Welch, of Dartmouth Medical School, and coauthor Dr. Archie Bleyer of the Oregon Health and Science University, analyzed 30 years of data on breast cancer incidence.

“And what we see is a dramatic increase — a doubling — in the amount of early-stage cancer,” Welch says. “But we don’t see a corresponding decrease in the amount of late-stage cancer.”

They say this means mammography isn’t catching many advanced breast cancers — even though it’s very good at catching early tumors.

Too good, perhaps. The duo says many of the early tumors revealed by mammography don’t need to be treated at all. Doctors call that “overdiagnosis.”

Welch says more than 1 million women have been overdiagnosed with breast cancer over the past 30 years. And the problem continues.

“Seventy thousand women a year are overdiagnosed and treated unnecessarily for breast cancer,” Welch says.

This all may come as a shock to many women — and their doctors. No other diagnostic test has been more aggressively promoted than mammography — or, lately, been so controversial, with the possible exception of PSA tests for prostate cancer.

“Whenever I see a paper like this, I say, ‘Oh, boy, here we go again!’ ” says Dr. Carol Lee, a breast-imaging specialist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.

Lee is on the communications committee of the American College of Radiology, whose members often do mammograms. In a statement, the group says the new analysis “is simply wrong.”

The ACR’s main criticism is that Welch and Bleyer don’t account for what the radiologists say was a steady increase in the incidence of invasive breast cancer. They say that can explain why mammography didn’t lower the incidence of advanced breast cancer more.

Welch rejects that claim. “Why was breast cancer incidence so stable in the late ’70s, only to shoot up in the 1980s — the very time mammography was introduced?” he writes in an email. “Why didn’t incidence rise dramatically in women under 40 — those not exposed to screening?”

Welch is no newcomer to debates over the benefits and harms of diagnostic screening tests. In fact, he’s a well-known iconoclast, who last year published the popular book Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health.

“He has a pre-existing bias, just as those of us in the breast-imaging community have a pre-existing bias,” Lee says. “The truth probably lies somewhere in between.”

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/11/21/165668987/with-routine-mammograms-some-breast-cancers-may-be-overtreated

 

Related

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Meet Dr. Eli Reshef

The other day, another physician asked me if I had to start all over again, would I still become a physician and would I still choose Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility as my sub-specialty. I answered with a resounding “yes”. I feel very fortunate to get up every morning looking forward to going to work. I feel privileged to have the opportunity to help people every day, that is every day, including weekends and holidays. Read More About Me Here-

Dr. Reshef's Most Popular Posts

  • Latest
  • Popular
  • Point of View: Big downside to premature return to “normal”
  • Thousands of eggs, embryos possibly damaged at Ohio hospital
  • YOUR EMBRYOS ARE SAFE!
  • Employers Who Wish to Retain Staff Should Consider Having Infertility Benefit
  • Older Men’s Sperm: Worse for the Wear?
  • Today Week Month All
  • OKC Doctor: Planned Parenthood defunding would curtail reproductive care options
  • There is no "baby deadline" test!
  • What You Really Need to Know About Egg Freezing
  • Vitamin D Deficiency- Is There Really a Pandemic?
  • Older Men’s Sperm: Worse for the Wear?
Ajax spinner

Post Archive

  • May 2020
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012

Contact Dr. Eli Reshef

  • We love people, not bots. Please select "Yes, I am Human" from the drop down below.

Recent Posts

  • Point of View: Big downside to premature return to “normal”
  • Thousands of eggs, embryos possibly damaged at Ohio hospital
  • YOUR EMBRYOS ARE SAFE!
  • Employers Who Wish to Retain Staff Should Consider Having Infertility Benefit
  • Older Men’s Sperm: Worse for the Wear?
  • Subfertility May be Harbinger of Disease Later in Life
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Eli Reshef, MD

3433 NW 56th Street, Suite 210-B
Oklahoma CIty , OK 73112
Phone: (405) 945-4701

Post Calendar

February 2021
M T W T F S S
« May    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Copyright © 2021 · Eli Reshef, MD. All Rights Reserved.